←back to thread

390 points pyman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
bgwalter ◴[] No.44490836[source]
Here is how individuals are treated for massive copyright infringement:

https://investors.autodesk.com/news-releases/news-release-de...

replies(8): >>44490942 #>>44491257 #>>44491526 #>>44491536 #>>44491907 #>>44493281 #>>44493918 #>>44493925 #
chourobin ◴[] No.44491257[source]
copyright is not the same as piracy
replies(2): >>44491334 #>>44491384 #
achierius ◴[] No.44491384[source]
Can you explain why? What makes them categorically different or at the very least why is "piracy" quantitatively worse than 'just' copyright violation?
replies(4): >>44491491 #>>44491559 #>>44491689 #>>44491863 #
charcircuit ◴[] No.44491559[source]
Saying that piracy isn't copyright violation is an RMS talking point. It's not worth trying to ask why because the answer will be RMS said so and will not be backed by the common usage of the word.
replies(2): >>44491638 #>>44492650 #
buzzerbetrayed ◴[] No.44491638[source]
You legitimately have it completely backwards. The word "piracy" was coopted to put a more severe spin on copyright violation. As a result, it became "the common usage of the word". But that was by design. And it's worth pushing back on.
replies(2): >>44492023 #>>44492038 #
1. charcircuit ◴[] No.44492038[source]
I don't have it backwards. Language evolved, and piracy got a new definition. It's even in the dictionary. Trying to redefine words like this is futile and avoiding certain words or replacing them with others is a quirk that RMS has.