(www.businessinsider.com)

393 points pyman | 1 comments | 07 Jul 25 09:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source

Show context

bgwalter ◴[07 Jul 25 14:38 UTC] No.44490836[source]▶

>>44488331 (OP) #

Here is how individuals are treated for massive copyright infringement:

https://investors.autodesk.com/news-releases/news-release-de...

replies(8): >>44490942 #>>44491257 #>>44491526 #>>44491536 #>>44491907 #>>44493281 #>>44493918 #>>44493925 #

chourobin ◴[07 Jul 25 15:15 UTC] No.44491257[source]▶

>>44490836 #

replies(2): >>44491334 #>>44491384 #

achierius ◴[07 Jul 25 15:29 UTC] No.44491384[source]▶

>>44491257 #

Can you explain why? What makes them categorically different or at the very least why is "piracy" quantitatively worse than 'just' copyright violation?

replies(4): >>44491491 #>>44491559 #>>44491689 #>>44491863 #

1. abeppu ◴[07 Jul 25 15:59 UTC] No.44491689[source]▶

>>44491384 #

Maybe the most memorable version of the response is this the "Copying is not Theft" song. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4

↑

Anthropic cut up millions of used books, and downloaded 7M pirated ones – judge