←back to thread

155 points everyone | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source

My washing machine broke down. I need a replacement. I must avoid getting a "smart" one though. Are there any lists of products that arent "smart" so I can know which models are viable options to buy? Or other resources? I'm based in Ireland.
Show context
wgx ◴[] No.44488919[source]
Try searching Reddit, I just found some lists. I’ve given up and instead just don’t allow things on my network. My “smart” TV begs me to see the network but I just use a Roku instead. I fear it’s come to this where we have to circumvent our own devices desperate need for connectivity.
replies(3): >>44488989 #>>44489327 #>>44490267 #
1. alok-g ◴[] No.44488989[source]
Hope there is no programmed issue built in. I have had devices stop working after some time saying it's been more than X years since I last updated the software and it then refuses to run. :-(
replies(2): >>44489531 #>>44489536 #
2. theturtle ◴[] No.44489531[source]
30 or more years ago I was at a law firm that had some specialized software to pump out the paperwork for residential mortgages. Every so often it would throw an error and refuse to run, which made it really popular with the paralegals who were trying to churn out a dozen mortgages a day. I called the software company. "Oh, that's not a real error, we just prefer that customers check in every so often." I called them many foul names and found out how to disable that shit. Another company sold us perverted Xerox 635 daisywheel printers that were EPROM'd to only work with their particular shitty app-specific typewheels. I had a buddy with an EEPROM burner, and we had several unperverted 635s from which we could draw clean copies. We burned new chips for every printer in the building (65 of them). And back then there wasn't shit the vendor could do. Overnight we repurposed the printers for use with regular PCs and our cost for new METAL xerox typewheels was far less.
3. mystraline ◴[] No.44489536[source]
I'd be filing a fraud lawsuit where the company is misrepresenting their goods, and logic-bombing them to disable after a condition is made.

And I would ask the maximum allowed with fraud, by law.

18 U.S. Code § 1030.

replies(1): >>44489650 #
4. alok-g ◴[] No.44489650[source]
>> 18 U.S. Code § 1030

Could you pls. point me to which paras are the most relevant to the said logic-based disabling?