←back to thread

Deno 2.4

(deno.com)
133 points hackandthink | 3 comments | 07 Jul 25 08:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.418s | source
Show context
blinkingled ◴[07 Jul 25 10:28 UTC] No.44488721[source]▶
Crazy that Deno is still not workable on FreeBSD because of the Rust V8 bindings not being ported.
replies(4): >>44488761 #>>44488769 #>>44489763 #>>44494047 #
Mond_ ◴[07 Jul 25 10:35 UTC] No.44488761[source]▶
How big is the intersection of modern Javascript developers and FreeBSD users?
replies(2): >>44488814 #>>44490918 #
1. blinkingled ◴[07 Jul 25 10:44 UTC] No.44488814[source]▶
Not as big as Linux but I know a few FreeBSD shops that run NodeJS apps so it's not entirely crazy to think that there are more and they would want to try Deno. Besides making your OSS software compilable on *BSD/Linux/Mac/Win has historically been a good thing to do anyways.
replies(2): >>44489087 #>>44490486 #
2. whizzter ◴[07 Jul 25 11:22 UTC] No.44489087[source]▶
For a lowlevel runtime (ie V8 itself) I can accept certain lag since there might be some low-level differences in how signals,etc behave.

However for more generic code Linux'isms often signals a certain "works-on-my-machine" mentality that might even hinder cross-distro compatibility, let alone getting things to work on Windows and/or osX development machines.

I guess a Rust binding for V8 is a tad borderline, not necessarily low-level but still an indicator that there's a lack of care for getting things to work on other machines.

3. surajrmal ◴[07 Jul 25 14:03 UTC] No.44490486[source]▶
Is it big enough to prioritize fixing though? The answer seems to be a no so far.