←back to thread

333 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
dathinab ◴[] No.44484445[source]
I _hope_ AGI is not right around the corner, for social political reasons we are absolutely not ready for it and it might push the future of humanity into a dystopia abyss.

but also just taking what we have now with some major power usage reduction and minor improvements here and there already seems like something which can be very usable/useful in a lot of areas (and to some degree we aren't even really ready for that either, but I guess thats normal with major technological change)

it's just that for those companies creating foundational models it's quite unclear how they can recoup their already spend cost without either major break through or forcefully (or deceptively) pushing it into a lot more places then it fits into

replies(6): >>44484506 #>>44484517 #>>44485067 #>>44485492 #>>44485764 #>>44486142 #
twelve40 ◴[] No.44484506[source]
I agree and sincerely hope this bubble pops soon

> Meta Invests $100 Billion into Augmented Reality

that fool controls the board and he seems to be just desperately throwing insane ad money against the wall hoping that something sticks

for Altman there is no backing out either, need to make hay while the sun shines

for the rest of us, i really hope these clowns fail like it's 2000 and never get to their dystopian matrix crap.

replies(1): >>44484649 #
pbreit ◴[] No.44484649[source]
"that fool" created a $1.8 trillion company.
replies(7): >>44484722 #>>44484911 #>>44485073 #>>44485117 #>>44485317 #>>44485710 #>>44487577 #
lowsong ◴[] No.44485317[source]
No the thousands of people working at Facebook did, he just got rich from it.
replies(2): >>44485606 #>>44486091 #
apsurd ◴[] No.44485606[source]
I'm no zuck fanboy, but i'm compelled to ask what purpose rejecting the role of a leader serves?

HN is "the smart reddit" as my brother coined, and i'm very aware of how much nonsense is on here, but it is in a relative sense true.

All to say, blindly bashing the role of a leader seems faulty and dismissive.

replies(2): >>44485849 #>>44487580 #
1. dandanua ◴[] No.44487580[source]
No one is rejecting the role of leader, it's just extremely exaggerated nowadays, like everyone thinks Facebook==Zuckerberg. And the leaders don't worth x1000 (or even x1000000 for some) unless they are doing a job of 1000 people. In most cases they are not even capable of doing 99% of the work people in their companies can do. Egomaniac Musk has already published his thoughts on programming problems, only confirming how dumb he is in this field.