←back to thread

Are we the baddies?

(geohot.github.io)
693 points AndrewSwift | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.596s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.44478235[source]
For some people, paying the premium to jump the queue is the point. What they didn't forsee is what happens when everyone has wound up paying the premium, and the queue is now with you again. This is mostly Australian frequent flyers, when it was a high barrier to entry it conferred advantages and now Fly in Fly out work has commoditised club status, there is next to no boarding advantage, and no points flight availability.

So yes. Status seeking, and differential price seeking probably is a-social as a pattern when it's weaponised against the consumer.

That said, I hated Uber, they actually offered to underwrite people breaking the law to get foot in the door (how that didn't get them excluded as a corporate scofflaw is beyond me) and they continue to export all the profits offshore, but taxi services had become shit and now we have got used to Uber and I just don't worry about surge pricing. I got boiled slowly.

My fellow Australians all feel a bit shit about the introduction of tipping in paywave and food service. That's unaustralian. We have legally enforced minimum wages and penalty rates. Turn that feature off.

The European push to mandate included luggage in flight is seeing a fair bit of trolling. So there are still true believers who think needing clean underwear is weak.

replies(16): >>44478304 #>>44478436 #>>44478619 #>>44478738 #>>44478946 #>>44478989 #>>44479057 #>>44479127 #>>44479393 #>>44479945 #>>44480176 #>>44480295 #>>44480476 #>>44480794 #>>44481108 #>>44486878 #
cainxinth ◴[] No.44480476[source]
Uber and Lyft are expensive but anyone who says they are worse than what they replaced doesn’t remember well the heydays of taxis. Sure, people in big towns like NYC could always get one fairly easily, but everyone else was stuck dealing with whatever potentially shady operation they could dig out of a phonebook, and even then getting a car wasn’t guaranteed.

Now, anyone anywhere can get a ride, often quickly. I’m not trying to excuse any predatory commercial practices directed at drivers or passengers, which are serious problems deserving of more strict regulation, but I absolutely do not want to go back to the old way.

replies(4): >>44480526 #>>44480543 #>>44480596 #>>44480634 #
Y-bar ◴[] No.44480634[source]
I remember the time before Uber arrived here, where ”here” obviously is not USA.

I don’t mind the old ways.

Taxis had apps before Uber arrived here, they had geolocation with ETA, contactless payment, up-front pricing, and never refused service (because they were required by law to offer service to anyone anywhere).

The problem probably never was incumbent taxis, it was how they were regulated (or not).

replies(2): >>44480700 #>>44481714 #
jen20 ◴[] No.44480700[source]
Taxis in the US are one of the most regulated services around, and they were still utterly atrocious.

Sure, they’re mandated to not refuse service, but you try getting picked up in Manhattan with a suitcase mid afternoon (when it’s obvious you’ll be taking the fixed fare to JFK in heavy traffic). To this day, the meter being “broken” is a tactic used in taxi strongholds like Las Vegas, even with this regulation.

The sweet spot for taxis was London, but I will go out of my way to avoid taking one lest I get forced to listen to the drivers views on Brexit for the entire ride.

replies(3): >>44481005 #>>44481741 #>>44481798 #
1. bko ◴[] No.44481798[source]
> Taxis in the US are one of the most regulated services around, and they were still utterly atrocious.

Maybe the fact that they were the most regulated services around was exactly why they were atrocious. Regulation often erects barriers to competition. It's impossible for a regulatory body to spell out every way in which a company can be exploitive and disallow it. The only thing that prevents bad behavior is meaningful competition.

It was this regulatory body that limited the number of cabs that could be on the road at any given time and set "fair" meter pricing. What resulted was that if you lived in a poor isolated neighborhood, there would be no cabs willing to take you there or driving around to pick you up. Uber solved this pretty much overnight.

replies(1): >>44485144 #
2. jen20 ◴[] No.44485144[source]
I did not speculate on the cause and effect - only the status quo circa ~2013-2014 pre-Uber.

Today though, Uber has definitely developed anti-competitive and frankly disgusting traits - they're just different ones to the taxi industry.