(www.honest-broker.com)

451 points imartin2k | 1 comments | 06 Jul 25 06:19 UTC | HN request time: 0.614s | source

Show context

m000 ◴[06 Jul 25 07:36 UTC] No.44478629[source]▶

I mostly agree with TFA, with one glaring exception: The quality of Google search results has regressed so badly in the past years (played by SEO experts), that AI was actually a welcome improvement.

replies(3): >>44478684 #>>44479259 #>>44480674 #

1. Nursie ◴[06 Jul 25 13:33 UTC] No.44480674[source]▶

>>44478629 #

LOL. I’ll take declining relevancy over (in order of badness) AI results that -

Badly summarise articles.

Outright invent local attractions that don’t exist.

Gave subtly wrong, misleading advice about employment rights.

All while coming across as confidently authoritative.

↑

The force-feeding of AI features on an unwilling public