←back to thread

451 points imartin2k | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.614s | source
Show context
m000 ◴[] No.44478629[source]
I mostly agree with TFA, with one glaring exception: The quality of Google search results has regressed so badly in the past years (played by SEO experts), that AI was actually a welcome improvement.
replies(3): >>44478684 #>>44479259 #>>44480674 #
1. Nursie ◴[] No.44480674[source]
LOL. I’ll take declining relevancy over (in order of badness) AI results that -

Badly summarise articles.

Outright invent local attractions that don’t exist.

Gave subtly wrong, misleading advice about employment rights.

All while coming across as confidently authoritative.