Hidden interface controls that affect usability

(interactions.acm.org)

559 points cxr | 1 comments | 05 Jul 25 23:10 UTC | HN request time: 0.208s | source

Show context

StellarScience ◴[06 Jul 25 01:08 UTC] No.44476903[source]▶

We have a user interface design rule that keyboard shortcuts and context menus must only be "shortcuts" for commands that are discoverable via clear buttons or menus. That probably makes our apps old-fashioned.

I recall learning that the four corners of the screen are the most valuable screen real estate, because it's easy to move the mouse to those locations quickly without fine control. So it's user-hostile that for Windows 11 Microsoft moved the default "Start" menu location to the center. And I don't think they can ascribe it to being mobile-first. Maybe it's "touch-first", where mouse motion doesn't apply.

replies(4): >>44478071 #>>44479379 #>>44480433 #>>44482211 #

moffkalast ◴[06 Jul 25 10:11 UTC] No.44479379[source]▶

>>44476903 #

I think the centered icons on W11 were done for one reason and one reason only: ripping off MacOS (probably because it's what the design team uses themselves and it felt familiar to them). There is no sensible UX reason to do it, and even in MacOS it's a detriment to its interface.

replies(1): >>44479985 #

1. jeroenhd ◴[06 Jul 25 12:02 UTC] No.44479985[source]▶

>>44479379 #

I don't think it's a macOS ripoff, they would've also ripped off more of the dock if that was the goal. For instance, you would've been able to do things like "pin the task bar to the side".

I think they wanted the start menu to be front and center. And honestly, that just sounds like a good idea, because it is where you go to do stuff that's not on your desktop already. But clicking a button in the bottom left and having the menu open in the middle would look weird, so centering the icons would make sense.

I think there are better ways to do it and I'm sure they've been tried, but they would probably confuse existing Windows users even more.

↑