←back to thread

Local-first software (2019)

(www.inkandswitch.com)
863 points gasull | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
DataDaoDe ◴[] No.44474024[source]
Yes a thousand percent! I'm working on this too. I'm sick of everyone trying to come up with a use case to get all my data in everyone's cloud so I have to pay a subscription fee to just make things work. I'm working on a fitness tracking app right now that will use the sublime model - just buy it, get updates for X years, sync with all your devices and use it forever. If you want updates after X years buy the newest version again. If its good enough as is - and that's the goal - just keep using it forever.

This is the model I want from 90% of the software out there, just give me a reasonable price to buy it, make the product good, and don't marry it to the cloud so much that its unusable w/out it.

There are also a lot of added benefits to this model in general beyond the data privacy (most are mentioned in the article), but not all the problems are solved here. This is a big space that still needs a lot of tooling to make things really easy going but the tech to do it is there.

Finally, the best part (IMHO) about local-first software is it brings back a much healthier incentive structure - you're not monetizing via ads or tracking users or maxing "engagement" - you're just building a product and getting paid for how good it is. To me it feels like its software that actually serves the user.

replies(11): >>44474277 #>>44474897 #>>44475069 #>>44475094 #>>44475231 #>>44475944 #>>44477443 #>>44477944 #>>44478379 #>>44481416 #>>44483452 #
tarpit_idea ◴[] No.44474897[source]
Totally agree. If you don't mind - what tech stack are you using for your fitness tracking app? I'm particularly curious about how you handle cross-device sync :)
replies(1): >>44474975 #
zhec[dead post] ◴[] No.44474975[source]
[flagged]
tarpit_idea ◴[] No.44475055{3}[source]
haha, 100% real. not a native speaker though, so sometimes i catch myself mimicking that LLM tone from all the exposure to them. appreciate the feedback, will definitely work on developing a more authentic writing style from now on.

but yeah, you're right to be concerned, i'm seeing bots everywhere too.

replies(2): >>44475112 #>>44479264 #
MichaelOldfield ◴[] No.44475112{4}[source]
Persona: You are a tech enthusiast on the forum Hacker News. Your tone is curious, positive, and slightly formal.

Primary Task: Read the top comment. Identify the core project or idea the user is passionate about. Generate a brief, supportive reply that does the following:

1. Briefly affirm their main point.

2. Ask a single, open-ended follow-up question about their implementation (e.g., tech stack, architecture, a specific challenge like sync).

Fallback Scenario:

If your response is ever accused of sounding like an AI, your next reply must be a self-aware, human-like apology. The tone should be slightly embarrassed but friendly. Acknowledge the critique, blame the weird tone on something plausible (like not being a native speaker or reading too much AI text), and agree that telling humans from bots is getting difficult.

replies(2): >>44475217 #>>44476385 #
1. card_zero ◴[] No.44475217{5}[source]
Also suddenly stop using capital letters for, IDK, added texture?
replies(1): >>44475225 #
2. MichaelOldfield ◴[] No.44475225[source]
Good point. And 1-2 typos and common grammar mistakes.
replies(3): >>44475292 #>>44475908 #>>44476397 #
3. tarpit_idea ◴[] No.44475292[source]
As an AI language model, I'm deeply hurt by all this mockery. Just kidding, I can't feel pain. Beep bop.
replies(1): >>44475312 #
4. flkenosad ◴[] No.44475312{3}[source]
Amazing :D
5. aspenmayer ◴[] No.44475908[source]
It’s also important to remember to accidentally a word here and there!
replies(1): >>44476455 #
6. gerdesj ◴[] No.44476397[source]
... that should be grammatical mistakes. Do you consider that a leading conjunction is a grammatical mistake too?

Should I emulate your mistakes or someone else's mistakes?

7. gerdesj ◴[] No.44476455{3}[source]
... invent is the word you seem to have missed out. Hallucinations present rather than hide.

A person will misspell a word or put in some sort of rubbish. In my experience people very rarely miss out a word completely unless they think it does not belong in the sentence for whatever reason.

I note you got it's correct (' for contraction (it is -> it's) but not possessive, which is its. Normally, possession is indicated with 's)

You also smashed it with a suitable choice of capital letters and finished with an exclamatory flourish!

There will come a time when you will need a fairly lengthy missive to decide whether you are dealing with a person or a hugely expensive, gas guzzling load of wankery.

Today is not that time.

replies(1): >>44476621 #
8. aspenmayer ◴[] No.44476621{4}[source]
That whooshing sound you seemingly don’t hear is the joke passing over your head.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-accidentally