←back to thread

'Positive review only': Researchers hide AI prompts in papers

(asia.nikkei.com)
177 points ohjeez | 1 comments | 05 Jul 25 15:15 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dynm ◴[05 Jul 25 16:09 UTC] No.44473682[source]▶
Just to be clear, these are hidden prompts put in papers by authors meant to be triggered only if a reviewer (unethically) uses AI to generate their review. I guess this is wrong, but I find it hard not to have some sympathy for the authors. Mostly, it seems like an indictment of the whole peer-review system.
replies(7): >>44473715 #>>44473896 #>>44473971 #>>44474071 #>>44474397 #>>44474483 #>>44474568 #
1. jedimastert ◴[05 Jul 25 18:27 UTC] No.44474568[source]▶
AI "peer" review of scientific research without a human in the loop is not only unethical, I would also consider it wildly irresponsible and down right dangerous.

I consider it a peer review of the peer review process