←back to thread

405 points tareqak | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
tomrod ◴[] No.44469345[source]
If correct, this is a good thing on a generally bad, overstuffed bill. Immediate expensing never should have been changed in the first place, and it was always weird seeing people twist themselves in knots defending it.
replies(4): >>44469474 #>>44469476 #>>44469714 #>>44471311 #
tossandthrow ◴[] No.44471311[source]
> Immediate expensing never should have been changed in the first place

This is indicative of ignorance. There is a reason why we have these rules.

replies(2): >>44473611 #>>44474362 #
1. trollbridge ◴[] No.44474362[source]
Sure, but not allowing expensing of software R&D was asinine.