←back to thread

197 points baylearn | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
lherron ◴[] No.44472822[source]
Honestly this article sounds like someone is unhappy that AI isn’t being deployed/developed “the way I feel it should be done”.

Talent changing companies is bad. Companies making money to pay for the next training run is bad. Consumers getting products they want is bad.

In the author’s view, AI should be advanced in a research lab by altruistic researchers and given directly to other altruistic researchers to advance humanity. It definitely shouldn’t be used by us common folk for fun and personal productivity.

replies(2): >>44473764 #>>44475233 #
1. hexage1814 ◴[] No.44473764[source]
This. The point of whining about VEO 3, “AI being used to create addictive products” really shows that. It's a text-to-video technology. The company has nothing to do if people use it to generate "low quality content". The same way internet companies aren't at fault that large amounts of the web are scams or similar junk.