←back to thread

Nvidia won, we all lost

(blog.sebin-nyshkim.net)
977 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
Show context
cherioo ◴[] No.44468628[source]
High end GPU has over the last 5 years slowly turning from an enthusiast product into a luxury product.

5 or maybe 10 years ago, high-end GPU are needed to run games at reasonably eye candy setting. In 2025, $500 mid-range GPUs are more than enough. Folks all over can barely tell between High and Ultra settings, DLSS vs FSR, or DLSS FG and Lossless Scaling. There's just no point to compete at $500 price point any more, that Nvidia has largely given up and relegating to the AMD-built Consoles, and integrated graphics like AMD APU, that offer good value in low-end, medium-end, and high-end.

Maybe the rumored Nvidia PC, or the Switch 2, can bring some resurgence.

replies(7): >>44468693 #>>44468874 #>>44469261 #>>44469281 #>>44469585 #>>44470770 #>>44473016 #
datagram ◴[] No.44470770[source]
The fact that we're calling $500 GPUs "midrange" is proof that Nvidia's strategy is working.
replies(2): >>44471170 #>>44472153 #
WithinReason ◴[] No.44471170[source]
What strategy? They charge more because manufacturing costs are higher, cost per transistor haven't changed much since 28nm [0] but chips have more and more transistors. What do you think that does to the price?

[0]: https://www.semiconductor-digest.com/moores-law-indeed-stopp...

replies(1): >>44473732 #
1. NooneAtAll3 ◴[] No.44473732[source]
strategy of marketting expensive product as normal one? obviously?

if your product can't be cheap - your product is luxury, not a day-to-day one

replies(1): >>44474028 #
2. WithinReason ◴[] No.44474028[source]
It's mid range. The range shifted.