←back to thread

197 points baylearn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.469s | source
Show context
empiko ◴[] No.44471933[source]
Observe what the AI companies are doing, not what they are saying. If they would expect to achieve AGI soon, their behaviour would be completely different. Why bother developing chatbots or doing sales, when you will be operating AGI in a few short years? Surely, all resources should go towards that goal, as it is supposed to usher the humanity into a new prosperous age (somehow).
replies(9): >>44471988 #>>44471991 #>>44472148 #>>44472874 #>>44473259 #>>44473640 #>>44474131 #>>44475570 #>>44476315 #
rvz ◴[] No.44471991[source]
Exactly. For example, Microsoft was building data centers all over the world since "AGI" was "around the corner" according to them.

Now they are cancelling those plans. For them "AGI" was cancelled.

OpenAI claims to be closer and closer to "AGI" as more top scientists left or are getting poached by other labs that are behind.

So why would you leave if the promise of achieving "AGI" was going to produce "$100B dollars of profits" as per OpenAI's and Microsoft's definition in their deal?

Their actions tell more than any of their statements or claims.

replies(4): >>44472058 #>>44472138 #>>44473043 #>>44474336 #
computerphage ◴[] No.44473043[source]
Wait, aren't they cancelling leases on non-ai data centers that aren't under Microsoft's control, while spending much more money to build new AI focused data centers that that own? Do you have a source that says they're canceling their own data centers?
replies(1): >>44473116 #
1. PessimalDecimal ◴[] No.44473116[source]
https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/hyperscale/article/552705... might fit the bill of what you are looking for.

Microsoft itself hasn't said they're doing this because of oversupply in infrastructure for it's AI offerings, but they very likely wouldn't say that publicly even if that's the reason.

replies(1): >>44473171 #
2. computerphage ◴[] No.44473171[source]
Thank you!