←back to thread

759 points alihm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
meander_water ◴[] No.44469163[source]
> the "taste-skill discrepancy." Your taste (your ability to recognize quality) develops faster than your skill (your ability to produce it). This creates what Ira Glass famously called "the gap," but I think of it as the thing that separates creators from consumers.

This resonated quite strongly with me. It puts into words something that I've been feeling when working with AI. If you're new to something and using AI for it, it automatically boosts the floor of your taste, but not your skill. And you end up never slowing down to make mistakes and learn, because you can just do it without friction.

replies(8): >>44469175 #>>44469439 #>>44469556 #>>44469609 #>>44470520 #>>44470531 #>>44470633 #>>44474386 #
furyofantares ◴[] No.44469609[source]
I'm confused. I often say of every genAI I've seen of all types that it is totally lacking in taste and only has skill. And it drastically raises your skill floor immediately, perhaps all the way up to your taste, closing the gap.

Maybe that actually is what you were saying? But I'm confused because you used the opposite words.

replies(4): >>44470373 #>>44472200 #>>44472295 #>>44473313 #
debugnik ◴[] No.44472295[source]
Closing the gap? I think we're inverting the gap: Many people now have access to a higher skill level than they've developed taste for (if they ever did), which makes them unable to judge their own slop.
replies(2): >>44472901 #>>44473548 #
1. ItsHarper ◴[] No.44472901[source]
Yeah this type of gap is going to become a huge problem the way things are going