←back to thread

Problems the AI industry is not addressing adequately

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
197 points baylearn | 1 comments | 05 Jul 25 10:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
bestouff ◴[05 Jul 25 11:10 UTC] No.44471877[source]▶
Are there some people here in HN believing in AGI "soonish" ?
replies(5): >>44471902 #>>44471982 #>>44472003 #>>44472071 #>>44472107 #
Davidzheng ◴[05 Jul 25 11:51 UTC] No.44472107[source]▶
what's your definition? AGI original definition is median human across almost all fields which I believe is basically achieved. If superhuman (better than best expert) I expect <2030 for all nonrobotic tasks and <2035 for all tasks
replies(3): >>44472644 #>>44473009 #>>44473060 #
jltsiren ◴[05 Jul 25 13:24 UTC] No.44472644[source]▶
Your "original definition" was always meaningless. A "Hello, World!" program is equally capable in most jobs as the median human. On the other hand, if the benchmark is what the median human can reasonably become (a professional with decades of experience), we are still far from there.
replies(1): >>44472836 #
1. Davidzheng ◴[05 Jul 25 13:56 UTC] No.44472836[source]▶
I agree with second part but not the first (far in capability not in timeline). I think you underestimate the distance of median wihout training and "hello world" in many economically meaningful jobs.