←back to thread

191 points aorloff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
throw0101d ◴[] No.44467342[source]
Personally I think that this can be considered on the "bug" side of Bitcoin's finite number coins: if, over time, they are lost, then there's a smaller quantity† of currency that is useable to actually do stuff with.

This can make the 'rate of deflation' that occurs worse:

* https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deflationary_spiral

* https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2014/06/the-perils-of-bitcoi...

* https://crypto.bi/deflationary/

† I am aware of satoshis.

replies(8): >>44467392 #>>44467410 #>>44467413 #>>44467486 #>>44467668 #>>44467917 #>>44469713 #>>44469776 #
crystaln ◴[] No.44467413[source]
Deflation is what you want for investment assets. Btc is primarily a value store and commodity like gold, not a currency. Deflation is a good thing when you are parking value.
replies(2): >>44467662 #>>44467754 #
throw0101d ◴[] No.44467754[source]
> Deflation is a good thing when you are parking value.

And is deflation a good or bad thing for the livelihood and well-being of human beings?

How many people in the US has a mortgage or some kind of debt (student, medical)? Inflation makes the burden of debt easier, deflation makes it worse.

And the Top (0.)1% already has an easy enough time with parking/generating value. Deflation would only help them more (and make things hard for everyone under them).

replies(2): >>44467897 #>>44472391 #
1. rufus_foreman ◴[] No.44472391[source]
>> How many people in the US has a mortgage or some kind of debt (student, medical)?

Approximately zero of them have debt denominated in Bitcoin. Meaning that the main drawback of deflation does not apply to Bitcoin.