←back to thread

197 points baylearn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.433s | source
1. PicassoCTs ◴[] No.44472204[source]
Im reading the "AI"-industry as a totally different bet- not so much, as a "AGI" is coming bet of many companies, but a "climate change collapse" is coming and we want to continue to be in business, even if our workers stay at home/flee or die, the infrastructure partially collapses and our central office burns to the ground-bet. In that regard, even the "AI" we have today, makes total sense as a insurance policy.
replies(1): >>44473097 #
2. PessimalDecimal ◴[] No.44473097[source]
It's hard to square this with the massive energy footprint required to run any current "AI" models.

If the main concern actually we're anthropogenic climate change, participating in this hype cycle's would make one disproportionately guilty of worsening the problem.

And it's unlikely to work if the plan requires the continued function of power hungry data centers.