←back to thread

278 points transpute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.251s | source
Show context
whywhywhywhy ◴[] No.44464674[source]
It's genuinely crazy how much better value an N100 is and how much better it works out of the box than a Pi for anything that is a little server, plex/jellyfin, self hosting project that doesn't need to talk to electronics/GPIO.

Caveat being about my comment is my N100 us used mostly as a Jellyfin server/torrent downloader running windows but has two SSDs inside it and has worked flawlessly for 2 years. Not sure how well it performs under Linux but I've used Pi's a lot previously and this beats it in terms of getting the job done and in price for a similar Pi setup.

replies(11): >>44464810 #>>44464889 #>>44464997 #>>44465661 #>>44465968 #>>44466599 #>>44466967 #>>44467502 #>>44467753 #>>44468280 #>>44470374 #
comboy ◴[] No.44464889[source]
There was maybe a short period of time when RPi offered a decent compute for money if ever. But all of that time it's about the ecosystem and simply being the most popular platform. Any hardware library, you take it and you know somebody tested it on this exact hardware with the same operating system. When doing hardware stuff it can be really painful to debug. You don't want to also be wondering if maybe some pin is handled differently on your box than RPi etc.
replies(2): >>44464937 #>>44471220 #
1. bigfatkitten ◴[] No.44471220[source]
The ecosystem (and in the early days, price) is about the only thing they’ve ever had going for them.

They’ve otherwise always been mediocre boards in pretty much every respect. Slow, relatively power hungry, and powered by a set top box SOC that is NDAed out the wazoo.