←back to thread

156 points feep | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
simonw ◴[] No.44464893[source]
I got my start in the CGI era, and it baked into me an extremely strong bias against running short-lived subprocesses for things.

We invented PHP and FastCGI mainly to get away from the performance hit of starting a new process just to handle a web request!

It was only a few years ago that I realized that modern hardware means that it really isn't prohibitively expensive to do that any more - this benchmark gets to 2,000/requests a second, and if you can even get to a few hundred requests a second it's easy enough to scale across multiple instances these days.

I have seen AWS Lambda described as the CGI model reborn and that's a pretty fair analogy.

replies(3): >>44465143 #>>44465227 #>>44465926 #
geocar ◴[] No.44465227[source]
I think you might have found that CGI scripts deployed as statically-linked C binaries, with some attention given to size, you might've not been so disappointed.

The "performance hit of starting a new process" is bigger if the process is a dynamically-linked php interpreter with gobs of shared libraries to load, and some source file, reading parsing compiling whatever, and not just by a little bit, always has been, so what the author is doing using go, I think, would still have been competitive 25 years ago if go had been around 25 years ago.

Opening an SQLite database is probably (surprisingly?) competitive to passing a few sockets through a context switch, across all server(ish) CPUS of this era and that, but both are much faster than opening a socket and authenticating to a remote mysql process, and programs that are not guestbook.cgi often have many more resource acquisitions which is why I think FastCGI is still pretty good for new applications today.

replies(1): >>44465544 #
simonw ◴[] No.44465544[source]
That's likely true - but C is a scary language to write web-facing applications in because it's so easy to have things like buffer overflows or memory leaks.
replies(7): >>44465786 #>>44466009 #>>44466418 #>>44467031 #>>44470699 #>>44470836 #>>44477576 #
1. anonzzzies ◴[] No.44470836[source]
I made fork run a chroot and if it crashes, it doesn't really matter as it's just a fork. At that time, people weren't really generally good breaking out of a chroot using exploits.