←back to thread

431 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.286s | source
Show context
riobard ◴[] No.44468092[source]
I’ve been always puzzled by the strange choice of raiding multiple small capacity M.2 NVMe in these tiny low-end Intel boxes with severely limited PCIe lanes using only one lane per SSD.

Why not a single large capacity M.2 SSD using 4 full lanes and proper backup with a cheaper , larger capacity and more reliable spinning disk?

replies(1): >>44468134 #
tiew9Vii ◴[] No.44468134[source]
The latest small M.2 NAS’s make very good consumer grade, small, quiet, power efficient storage you can put in your living room, next to the tv for media storage and light network attached storage.

It’d be great if you could fully utilise the M.2 speed but they are not about that.

Why not a single large M.2? Price.

replies(1): >>44468181 #
riobard ◴[] No.44468181[source]
Would four 2TB SSD be more or less expensive than one 8TB SSD? And also counting power efficiency and RAID complexity?
replies(1): >>44468937 #
adgjlsfhk1 ◴[] No.44468937[source]
4 small drives+raid gives you redundancy.
replies(2): >>44469011 #>>44470112 #
1. foobiekr ◴[] No.44470112[source]
Given the write patterns of RAID and the wear issues of flash, it's not obvious at all that 4xNVME actually gives you meaningful redundancy.