←back to thread

333 points tareqak | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tomrod ◴[] No.44469345[source]
If correct, this is a good thing on a generally bad, overstuffed bill. Immediate expensing never should have been changed in the first place, and it was always weird seeing people twist themselves in knots defending it.
replies(4): >>44469474 #>>44469476 #>>44469714 #>>44471311 #
mindslight ◴[] No.44469714[source]
Twisting not required. Depreciation straightforwardly applies to every other business capital expenditure. Hire someone to put a new roof on a rental property, and you're out the tens of thousands of dollars cash while only getting an immediate deduction for one thirtieth of the value. If you were expecting to pay that cash out of income, it's effectively a realized income and then reinvestment.

The recent (-ly undone) change went against decades of how things were, was crippling for medium size cashflow-positive startups, effectively increased taxes, etc. But it was really just a straightforward application of the general principles that apply to most everything else.

replies(2): >>44469790 #>>44471232 #
djoldman ◴[] No.44469790[source]
?

This applied to salaries, it wasn't a capital expenditure as "capital expenditure" has traditionally been defined.

This was an operational expense.

replies(2): >>44469815 #>>44469822 #
1. tomrod ◴[] No.44469822[source]
While accurate, capex captures the building of things, like hiring a company (that pays salaries) to build a factory.