←back to thread

429 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sandreas ◴[] No.44466616[source]
While it may be tempting to go "mini" and NVMe, for a normal use case I think this is hardly cost effective.

You give up so much by using an all in mini device...

No Upgrades, no ECC, harder cooling, less I/O.

I have had a Proxmox Server with a used Fujitsu D3417 and 64gb ecc for roughly 5 years now, paid 350 bucks for the whole thing and upgraded the storage once from 1tb to 2tb. It draws 12-14W in normal day use and has 10 docker containers and 1 windows VM running.

So I would prefer a mATX board with ECC, IPMI 4xNVMe and 2.5GB over these toy boxes...

However, Jeff's content is awesome like always

replies(8): >>44466782 #>>44466835 #>>44467230 #>>44467786 #>>44467994 #>>44468973 #>>44470088 #>>44475321 #
ndiddy ◴[] No.44467994[source]
Another thing is that unless you have a very specific need for SSDs (such as heavily random access focused workloads, very tight space constraints, or working in a bumpy environment), mechanical hard drives are still way more cost effective for storing lots of data than NVMe. You can get a manufacturer refurbished 12TB hard drive with a multi-year warranty for ~$120, while even an 8TB NVMe drive goes for at least $500. Of course for general-purpose internal drives, NVMe is a far better experience than a mechanical HDD, but my NAS with 6 hard drives in RAIDz2 still gets bottlenecked by my 2.5GBit LAN, not the speeds of the drives.
replies(4): >>44468216 #>>44469623 #>>44473236 #>>44473616 #
1. throw0101d ◴[] No.44469623[source]
> […] mechanical hard drives are still way more cost effective for storing lots of data than NVMe.

Linux ISOs?