←back to thread

155 points feep | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
sugarpimpdorsey ◴[] No.44464798[source]
Surprised with the choice of Apache. There are better choices for serving CGI nowadays. The only reason for still running Apache is you have legacy cruft that requires Apache (like .htaccess).
replies(5): >>44464841 #>>44464842 #>>44465210 #>>44466147 #>>44469039 #
1. EasyMark ◴[] No.44469039[source]
Apache works great for me and my small to medium loads. Sure it's not as fast as some of the lighter choices but the bottleneck isn't the webserver, it's all the database queries and network latencies.