←back to thread

252 points CharlesW | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
kelsey98765431 ◴[] No.44457519[source]
happier and happier about leaving behind digital media to return to physical. to me this is literally slop. i want the uncompressed file stop selling me stepped on product
replies(4): >>44457632 #>>44458543 #>>44459074 #>>44461075 #
recursive ◴[] No.44459074[source]
Uncompressed 4k video is ~5Gbps (3840 * 2160 * 3 * 24 * 8). A 2-hour movie clocks in at about 4.3TB. (3840 * 2160 * 3 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 2)

All that is 24fps.

That's without audio, which I assume you also want to be uncompressed.

replies(2): >>44461322 #>>44463364 #
fc417fc802 ◴[] No.44461322[source]
TBF even as bloated as 48/24 FLAC is it's a rounding error at that point.
replies(1): >>44462776 #
recursive ◴[] No.44462776[source]
But FLAC is compressed. Don't forget 13 channels. Only the best! Probably 192 khz.
replies(2): >>44463373 #>>44463487 #
account42 ◴[] No.44463373[source]
Even though op wrote "uncompressed" you should be able to deduce from context that they meant not lossy compressed.
replies(1): >>44468796 #
1. recursive ◴[] No.44468796[source]
If either lossless or uncompressed was reasonable in this instance, I would interpret it as such. Uncompressed video is completely bonkers of course. So is lossless. Shrug.