(lwn.net)

144 points ksec | 2 comments | 04 Jul 25 13:32 UTC | HN request time: 0.417s | source

Show context

Linux needs a true answer to ZFS that's not btrfs. Sadly the ship has sailed for btrfs, after 15+ years it's still not something trustable.

Apparently bcachefs won't be the successor. Filesystem development for Linux needs a big shakeup.

bombcar ◴[04 Jul 25 22:01 UTC] No.44468201[source]▶

ZFS is good enough for 90% of people who need that so no real money is available for anything new.

Maybe a university could do it.

replies(1): >>44468226 #

Indeed, and it's inclusion in Ubuntu is fantastic. It's also showing it's age, 20 years now. Tso, where are you when we need you most!?

1. XorNot ◴[04 Jul 25 22:49 UTC] No.44468588[source]▶

I mean, is it? It's a filesystem and it works. How is it "showing its age"?

replies(1): >>44473792 #

2. ◴[05 Jul 25 16:28 UTC] No.44473792[source]▶

Bcachefs may be headed out of the kernel