←back to thread

191 points aorloff | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
throw0101d ◴[] No.44467342[source]
Personally I think that this can be considered on the "bug" side of Bitcoin's finite number coins: if, over time, they are lost, then there's a smaller quantity† of currency that is useable to actually do stuff with.

This can make the 'rate of deflation' that occurs worse:

* https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deflationary_spiral

* https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2014/06/the-perils-of-bitcoi...

* https://crypto.bi/deflationary/

† I am aware of satoshis.

replies(8): >>44467392 #>>44467410 #>>44467413 #>>44467486 #>>44467668 #>>44467917 #>>44469713 #>>44469776 #
crystaln ◴[] No.44467413[source]
Deflation is what you want for investment assets. Btc is primarily a value store and commodity like gold, not a currency. Deflation is a good thing when you are parking value.
replies(2): >>44467662 #>>44467754 #
1. mrbombastic ◴[] No.44467662[source]
The original bitcoin whitepaper was titled: “a peer to peer electronic cash system”
replies(2): >>44467719 #>>44467762 #
2. throw0101d ◴[] No.44467719[source]
>> Btc is primarily a value store and commodity like gold, not a currency. Deflation is a good thing when you are parking value.

> The original bitcoin whitepaper was titled: “a peer to peer electronic cash system”

The goalposts, they move.

3. solumunus ◴[] No.44467762[source]
The initial intention does not change the practical reality.