←back to thread

190 points aorloff | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.455s | source
Show context
throw0101d ◴[] No.44467342[source]
Personally I think that this can be considered on the "bug" side of Bitcoin's finite number coins: if, over time, they are lost, then there's a smaller quantity† of currency that is useable to actually do stuff with.

This can make the 'rate of deflation' that occurs worse:

* https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deflationary_spiral

* https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2014/06/the-perils-of-bitcoi...

* https://crypto.bi/deflationary/

† I am aware of satoshis.

replies(8): >>44467392 #>>44467410 #>>44467413 #>>44467486 #>>44467668 #>>44467917 #>>44469713 #>>44469776 #
serial_dev ◴[] No.44467392[source]
When I listen to Bitcoin discussions, one of the advantages people bring up is that there is a limited number of it and you can’t just “print” more.

Considering this, while it is true that all this makes deflation worse, I’d assume most bitcoin hodlers would not mind this.

replies(3): >>44467652 #>>44467687 #>>44470300 #
1. doublerabbit ◴[] No.44467652[source]
What happens when all bitcoin is mined, societal collapse?
replies(2): >>44467676 #>>44467707 #
2. cjbgkagh ◴[] No.44467676[source]
It will go from the near totality of people acquiring their bitcoins through purchase to actual totality.
3. Hamuko ◴[] No.44467707[source]
We have other coins too.