←back to thread

189 points aorloff | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.938s | source | bottom
Show context
duttish ◴[] No.44467188[source]
Whoever got these wallets better sell them and get a good security company on rotation quickly before anyone find out who they are. Seems like wrench attacks been been happening a lot more the last year.
replies(4): >>44467215 #>>44467241 #>>44467326 #>>44467363 #
Marsymars ◴[] No.44467326[source]
I don't really get these; there's not a ton of difference between using a wrench to threaten someone with a bunch of Bitcoin vs using a wrench to threaten someone with a bunch of any other liquid asset that could be used to buy bitcoins.
replies(5): >>44467351 #>>44467365 #>>44467391 #>>44467513 #>>44470021 #
1. BJones12 ◴[] No.44467365[source]
If I had 8 billion in cash in my bank account and put in a transfer order, they'd block it, call me, make me come into a branch, make sure there weren't any burly guys with wrenches escorting me in, and maybe call the FBI if anything seemed off.

And if it was still legit after that, there would be days or weeks of waiting for the transfer to actually happen, during which time I could call and cancel.

replies(4): >>44467390 #>>44467616 #>>44467845 #>>44468296 #
2. onlyrealcuzzo ◴[] No.44467390[source]
Also, for the rest of your life, you'd be able to get the people arrested who stole the money.

So they'd either to kill you after, and it would be obvious why, and there'd be an easy lead on who.

Your odds of getting away with stealing that kind of money conventionally are essentially zero.

3. yieldcrv ◴[] No.44467616[source]
> And if it was still legit after that, there would be days or weeks of waiting for the transfer to actually happen

or you get a better bank to begin with

most banks that call their slow processes "security purposes" are actually just putting up barriers to maintain liquidity. the banks that go bust are the ones that got clientele based on making it convenient to transfer

4. paulpauper ◴[] No.44467845[source]
But the criminal's stolen BTC are tainted. Exchanges will not accept them. procession of them is a crime
replies(2): >>44468712 #>>44470529 #
5. Marsymars ◴[] No.44468296[source]
Alright, so I can see it as a matter of scale.

Recently there was a local case of someone extorting people by leaving threats in the mailboxes to not burn people’s houses down in exchange for $1k in bitcoin.

But who would keep $8B in bitcoin without some protections in place to ensure that it can’t be easily transferred away, given the associated upside/downside? That’s... roughly as foolish as keeping $8B in actual cash/gold/gems (notwithstanding the logistical problems with the size/weight) under your mattress.

6. jhasse ◴[] No.44468712[source]
Mixers will though.
replies(1): >>44474240 #
7. FabHK ◴[] No.44470529[source]
How fortunate that exchanges are centralized institutions that can be held accountable by law.
8. paulpauper ◴[] No.44474240{3}[source]
and then those bitcoin are tainted too due to association with the mixer