←back to thread

21 points tosh | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
steveBK123 ◴[] No.44466084[source]
Interesting from a cost perspective but I hope it doesn’t introduce any oddities in software compatibility.

There’s already things the M chip series iPads can do that the A chip series can’t.

replies(2): >>44466138 #>>44466145 #
xattt ◴[] No.44466145[source]
The new multitasking features (movable windows, pseudo-desktop environment) of iPadOS might be telegraphing an “iBook” line-up.

Meanwhile, the MacBook stays with the M chips.

replies(1): >>44466360 #
msgodel ◴[] No.44466360[source]
OSX could run just fine on the iPad today. There's no technical limitation, there's nothing to develop (nothing non-trivial anyway.)

OSX does not run on the iPad because it would give iPad users an escape from profitable "value add."

replies(2): >>44466429 #>>44467854 #
ch_sm ◴[] No.44466429[source]
Also, it doesn‘t run on iPads because it would be very difficult to use all these mouse and keyboard centric UIs with only your finger.
replies(3): >>44466519 #>>44466877 #>>44467562 #
1. msgodel ◴[] No.44466519{3}[source]
Nah. I used a phone for two years running Linux with FVWM and mostly VTE apps. If anything keyboard driven UIs are nicer on touch screens since the controls don't slide over each other all the time.

Most people think they would be bad because they haven't tried them.

replies(1): >>44467865 #
2. burnerthrow008 ◴[] No.44467865[source]
But macOS is not primarily a keyboard driven UI?