←back to thread

My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

(twitter.com)
931 points sohzm | 1 comments | 04 Jul 25 02:04 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
litexlang ◴[04 Jul 25 02:38 UTC] No.44460699[source]▶
Sorry for your story. In those days open source is REALLY HARD. Put your github link here and we will support your project by starring you and spreading your project. You definitely need to fight back.
replies(2): >>44460743 #>>44460754 #
npsomaratna ◴[04 Jul 25 02:51 UTC] No.44460754[source]▶
Not the developer, but here is his repo:

https://github.com/sohzm/cheating-daddy

replies(2): >>44460803 #>>44462376 #
dheerajvs ◴[04 Jul 25 08:19 UTC] No.44462376[source]▶
As an interviewer, I'm seeing a huge increase in proportion of candidates cheating surreptitiously during video interviews. And it's becoming difficult to suspect any wrong-doing unless you're very watchful by looking for academic responses to questions.

Why would anyone encourage building such a tool, I can't fathom.

replies(11): >>44462519 #>>44462688 #>>44462727 #>>44462929 #>>44463152 #>>44463158 #>>44463655 #>>44465775 #>>44465827 #>>44465880 #>>44467024 #
koffiezet ◴[04 Jul 25 09:07 UTC] No.44462688{3}[source]▶
When interviewers use LLM gargbage to filter out participants, expect candidates to do the same.
replies(1): >>44463340 #
dheerajvs ◴[04 Jul 25 10:49 UTC] No.44463340{4}[source]▶
I don't use LLMs to filter out participants and I expect candidates not to use LLMs to cheat.
replies(3): >>44463436 #>>44463582 #>>44464492 #
csomar ◴[04 Jul 25 13:43 UTC] No.44464492{5}[source]▶
Some first/introductory interviews are now "powered" by AI. As in, the interviewee gets an AI bot that evaluates them. I'd not be surprised if this takes over and becomes standard.
replies(2): >>44464862 #>>44465843 #
1. conartist6 ◴[04 Jul 25 14:27 UTC] No.44464862{6}[source]▶
Don't candidates also get a say? If a company asked me to jump through that hoop I'd have a simple one-word response. "No"

If enough good candidates have that reaction, it will become a prestige marker for a company to not use AI screening to give them access to the best candidates