(jacob.gold)

155 points feep | 1 comments | 04 Jul 25 13:16 UTC | HN request time: 0.208s | source

Show context

sugarpimpdorsey ◴[04 Jul 25 14:18 UTC] No.44464798[source]▶

Surprised with the choice of Apache. There are better choices for serving CGI nowadays. The only reason for still running Apache is you have legacy cruft that requires Apache (like .htaccess).

replies(5): >>44464841 #>>44464842 #>>44465210 #>>44466147 #>>44469039 #

1. immibis ◴[04 Jul 25 14:24 UTC] No.44464842[source]▶

>>44464798 #

I think the point of the experiment was to see how fast the old-school tech stack would go on modern hardware.

↑

Serving 200M requests per day with a CGI-bin