←back to thread

291 points jshchnz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.276s | source

Soham Parekh is all the rage on Twitter right now with a bunch of startups coming out of the woodwork saying they either had currently employed him or had in the past.

Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?

Show context
tkiolp4 ◴[] No.44463143[source]
Honestly, it’s the way I’m planning to go. Not 4 simultaneous full time jobs, but 2 (or one fulltime job and 2 contractor part time jobs). Reason: it’s easier to pass the interview for less demanding jobs (not faang, not second level faang), they are less demanding in the day to day (no “exceeds expectations”, “meets expectations”, “under expectations”, just simply “good job Joe!” and “shit happens Joe”), they are usually less structured (no silly ex-faang engineers/managers playing god). They usually pay less, ofc, hence the need to have a couple of jobs.

At least in western europe, it’s very hard to land a 130K job, but two 65K jobs? Rather fine.

replies(3): >>44463238 #>>44463676 #>>44485280 #
distances ◴[] No.44463676[source]
I wonder how two full time contracts could even work out in Europe. Surely they both can't pay the social security contributions, pension etc?

Also don't most work contracts expressly prohibit taking a second job, with the reasoning that the company expects employees to rest so they stay productive in the main job?

It's hard to get a 130K job in EU but it's easy to reach and exceed that as an independent contractor, so that's an avenue you could try out.

replies(3): >>44464723 #>>44464743 #>>44472290 #
1. Havoc ◴[] No.44464743[source]
>Also don't most work contracts expressly prohibit taking a second job

Every single full time work contract that wasn't written by a complete moron spells out that full time is in fact full time.

The overemployed crowd just ignores it an hope they don't get sued / word spreads / prior gigs won't reference