←back to thread

My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

(twitter.com)
932 points sohzm | 1 comments | 04 Jul 25 02:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
litexlang ◴[04 Jul 25 02:38 UTC] No.44460699[source]▶
Sorry for your story. In those days open source is REALLY HARD. Put your github link here and we will support your project by starring you and spreading your project. You definitely need to fight back.
replies(2): >>44460743 #>>44460754 #
npsomaratna ◴[04 Jul 25 02:51 UTC] No.44460754[source]▶
Not the developer, but here is his repo:

https://github.com/sohzm/cheating-daddy

replies(2): >>44460803 #>>44462376 #
dheerajvs ◴[04 Jul 25 08:19 UTC] No.44462376[source]▶
As an interviewer, I'm seeing a huge increase in proportion of candidates cheating surreptitiously during video interviews. And it's becoming difficult to suspect any wrong-doing unless you're very watchful by looking for academic responses to questions.

Why would anyone encourage building such a tool, I can't fathom.

replies(11): >>44462519 #>>44462688 #>>44462727 #>>44462929 #>>44463152 #>>44463158 #>>44463655 #>>44465775 #>>44465827 #>>44465880 #>>44467024 #
giantg2 ◴[04 Jul 25 10:18 UTC] No.44463152[source]▶
I won't use it, but I do see it as somewhat symmetric. If the interviewers are using AI or expecting you to use AI for these tasks once you're on the job, then it doesn't seem completely immoral.
replies(1): >>44463368 #
dheerajvs ◴[04 Jul 25 10:53 UTC] No.44463368[source]▶
That's assuming all interviewers are using AI. And if it's not immoral, why do it surreptitiously?
replies(1): >>44464527 #
1. giantg2 ◴[04 Jul 25 13:47 UTC] No.44464527[source]▶
Not just interviewers, but tasks at the company. How many companies are not allowing you to use copilot or similar once you're hired?

Morality and restrictions are two different things. Just because someone makes up a rule doesn't mean it's morally enforceable.