←back to thread

My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

(twitter.com)
931 points sohzm | 5 comments | 04 Jul 25 02:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.842s | source
Show context
litexlang ◴[04 Jul 25 02:38 UTC] No.44460699[source]▶
Sorry for your story. In those days open source is REALLY HARD. Put your github link here and we will support your project by starring you and spreading your project. You definitely need to fight back.
replies(2): >>44460743 #>>44460754 #
npsomaratna ◴[04 Jul 25 02:51 UTC] No.44460754[source]▶
Not the developer, but here is his repo:

https://github.com/sohzm/cheating-daddy

replies(2): >>44460803 #>>44462376 #
dheerajvs ◴[04 Jul 25 08:19 UTC] No.44462376[source]▶
As an interviewer, I'm seeing a huge increase in proportion of candidates cheating surreptitiously during video interviews. And it's becoming difficult to suspect any wrong-doing unless you're very watchful by looking for academic responses to questions.

Why would anyone encourage building such a tool, I can't fathom.

replies(11): >>44462519 #>>44462688 #>>44462727 #>>44462929 #>>44463152 #>>44463158 #>>44463655 #>>44465775 #>>44465827 #>>44465880 #>>44467024 #
koffiezet ◴[04 Jul 25 09:07 UTC] No.44462688[source]▶
When interviewers use LLM gargbage to filter out participants, expect candidates to do the same.
replies(1): >>44463340 #
dheerajvs ◴[04 Jul 25 10:49 UTC] No.44463340[source]▶
I don't use LLMs to filter out participants and I expect candidates not to use LLMs to cheat.
replies(3): >>44463436 #>>44463582 #>>44464492 #
hopelite ◴[04 Jul 25 11:32 UTC] No.44463582[source]▶
Have you tried putting yourself in the perspective of the humans trying to find a job in a market that is turning over now and was already dystopian before AI was injected into a dystopian, hellish process of “putting on a tie and using a firm handshake” to apply into the void.
replies(2): >>44463739 #>>44464092 #
1. gwd ◴[04 Jul 25 11:54 UTC] No.44463739[source]▶
This is so stupid. One of the main reasons it's become a dystopian, hellish process is because people cheat; proliferating cheating will make it even worse.

Lying and cheating on a job interview isn't a victimless crime. You're harming the company and all your coworkers when they hire you into a job you're not qualified for; you're harming all the other actually qualified candidates that didn't get hired instead; you're harming yourself, when your salary comes from a company who rely on you to give something you can't give them.

replies(2): >>44464248 #>>44464262 #
2. Nextgrid ◴[04 Jul 25 13:14 UTC] No.44464248[source]▶
> they hire you into a job you're not qualified for

Interviewing has long been disconnected from the actual job.

> who rely on you to give something you can't give them.

That's what firing is for.

replies(1): >>44464553 #
3. EraYaN ◴[04 Jul 25 13:15 UTC] No.44464262[source]▶
Well be prepared for it to get MUCH MUCH worse, two AI agents battling it out trying to get each other to mess up. While all the human have no idea what the hell is happening.
4. gwd ◴[04 Jul 25 13:50 UTC] No.44464553[source]▶
> That's what firing is for.

"I only harmed the company and my coworkers and myself for a year, before they had built up enough of a case to fire me."

That's a year they could have been paying someone competent, rather than working around your incompetence.

replies(1): >>44464665 #
5. qualeed ◴[04 Jul 25 14:02 UTC] No.44464665{3}[source]▶
I sympathize with your point, but if it takes you anywhere close to a year to figure out that someone faked their way into a position... that's bad.