←back to thread

291 points jshchnz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.366s | source

Soham Parekh is all the rage on Twitter right now with a bunch of startups coming out of the woodwork saying they either had currently employed him or had in the past.

Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?

Show context
oh_fiddlesticks ◴[] No.44462790[source]
What is the difference between this and leadership being in the committees, boards and executive seats of multiple companies?

Why is it the social expectation that an IC must devote 100% of their time and energy to the operations of a single company, when their senior leadership often manages their time between the affairs of many companies in their purview?

replies(8): >>44462849 #>>44462859 #>>44462864 #>>44462975 #>>44463126 #>>44463210 #>>44463408 #>>44466188 #
mytailorisrich ◴[] No.44462849[source]
You've answer your own question. If you are hired to work full-time you are expected to do that (as per your contract). If you are on a board or committee the expectation is a number of hours per month.
replies(1): >>44463029 #
anonzzzies ◴[] No.44463029[source]
But fulltime is a contract thing (at least here) and defined by 40 hrs a week. In my country 32-36 in contracts is also called fulltime. So after those hours, I did my fulltime and now you do not own me until the next 40 hours. Unless working for competitors currently here you cannot make valid contracts to prevent it either.
replies(2): >>44463189 #>>44463297 #
1. closewith ◴[] No.44463297[source]
However, if you are in the EU, then all your employers are jointly responsible for ensuring that your collective working hours don't breach the Working Time Directive, which means 48 hours as the maximum average working week, calculated over a 4-month period, across all employers (excluding certain statutory roles like seamen, law enforcement, and military).