←back to thread

Zig breaking change – Initial Writergate

(github.com)
228 points Retro_Dev | 1 comments | 04 Jul 25 04:11 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
adastra22 ◴[04 Jul 25 09:04 UTC] No.44462666[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(3): >>44462698 #>>44462763 #>>44462827 #
rcastellotti ◴[04 Jul 25 09:08 UTC] No.44462698[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(1): >>44462737 #
ladyanita22 ◴[04 Jul 25 09:14 UTC] No.44462737[source]▶
Be as sarcastic as you want. This is a feeling many developers probably share.
replies(2): >>44462925 #>>44463798 #
1. 3836293648 ◴[04 Jul 25 09:39 UTC] No.44462925[source]▶
Then those developers won't ever use anything ever. Why would breaking changes in an explicitly unstable development version exclude it from use for all time?

If you want stability, stick to stuff that has stability guarantees, but at the very least let them make breaking changes during development.