←back to thread

480 points riffraff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.468s | source
Show context
dang ◴[] No.44463006[source]
[stub for offtopicness]
replies(15): >>44461279 #>>44461280 #>>44461309 #>>44461334 #>>44461385 #>>44461408 #>>44461448 #>>44461634 #>>44461664 #>>44461731 #>>44461790 #>>44462060 #>>44462362 #>>44462565 #>>44462687 #
nokeya[dead post] ◴[] No.44462060[source]
[flagged]
lopis ◴[] No.44462074[source]
Of course the climate is ok for the planet. The planet is a huge rock. What on Earth is your point?
replies(2): >>44462118 #>>44462119 #
verisimi ◴[] No.44462119[source]
I think the point would be if the climate changes radically on the planet regardless of humans, why do we think these changes are driven by humanity? Perhaps the point is also what is bad about the warming that is being measured? Ie, if change is inevitable, warming rather than cooling could be more beneficial.
replies(2): >>44462165 #>>44466505 #
1. nokeya ◴[] No.44462165[source]
Thank you for explaining my thoughts clearer than I was able to do. Exactly.