←back to thread

480 points riffraff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
dang ◴[] No.44463006[source]
[stub for offtopicness]
replies(15): >>44461279 #>>44461280 #>>44461309 #>>44461334 #>>44461385 #>>44461408 #>>44461448 #>>44461634 #>>44461664 #>>44461731 #>>44461790 #>>44462060 #>>44462362 #>>44462565 #>>44462687 #
topato ◴[] No.44461309[source]
Did it actually say it will DOUBLE the CO2 concentration? Definitely past the point of no return. I guess us millennials WILL actually see the worst climate change outcomes WELL within our lifetimes...
replies(9): >>44461393 #>>44461407 #>>44461467 #>>44461507 #>>44461657 #>>44461694 #>>44461862 #>>44462190 #>>44462905 #
panstromek ◴[] No.44461467[source]
The keyword here is "Long term" I suppose, that can mean anything. I couldn't actually find where this claim comes from. The referenced paper doesn't seem to say anything about doubling CO2 concetrations.
replies(2): >>44462028 #>>44462180 #
1. SwtCyber ◴[] No.44462028[source]
Still serious, but yeah, the headline might be running ahead of the data a bit