(twitter.com)

931 points sohzm | 5 comments | 04 Jul 25 02:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.631s | source

1. ipsum2 ◴[04 Jul 25 04:50 UTC] No.44461215[source]▶

This is the second time in less than a year something similar has happened.

Previously, a different YC company (Pear AI) copied Continue, changed the licenses, and "launched".

I wonder if Pear AI is dead or pivoted, their open source repos have not been updated since May.

2. crystaln ◴[04 Jul 25 07:50 UTC] No.44462191[source]▶

Probably just went closed source.

3. re-thc ◴[04 Jul 25 11:42 UTC] No.44463656[source]▶

> I wonder if Pear AI is dead or pivoted, their open source repos have not been updated since May.

They went pear-shaped.

4. zelphirkalt ◴[04 Jul 25 15:13 UTC] No.44465253[source]▶

Maybe a kind of hall of shame is needed, where these companies are listed, and perhaps a link to a history of how the issue was dealt with.

replies(1): >>44470278 #

5. thro1 ◴[05 Jul 25 05:27 UTC] No.44470278[source]▶

HN seems to be fine with that (!).

My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]