←back to thread

Tools: Code Is All You Need

(lucumr.pocoo.org)
313 points Bogdanp | 3 comments | 03 Jul 25 10:51 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
alganet ◴[03 Jul 25 21:09 UTC] No.44459219[source]▶
It's finally happening. The acceleration of the full AI disillusionment:

- LLMs will do everything.

- Shit, they won't. I'll do some traditional programming to put it on a leash.

- More traditional programming.

- Wait, this traditional programming thing is quite good.

- I barely use LLMs now.

- Man, that LLM stuff was a bad trip.

See you all on the other side!

replies(1): >>44460725 #
1. meowface ◴[04 Jul 25 02:43 UTC] No.44460725[source]▶
You very much misunderstood the article (or, more likely, didn't even open it) because it fit your increasingly fringe skeptic narrative.
replies(1): >>44461191 #
2. alganet ◴[04 Jul 25 04:45 UTC] No.44461191[source]▶
I don't get it.

I misunderstood _because_ it fits my narrative? Or I didn't opened it _because_ it fits my narrative?

I think I nailed it, and the article approach is representative of the "oh shit, it can't do it all" phase, which soon will be followed by "more traditional programming".

These guys promised you an LLM that can do magic, from curing cancer to solve democracy, while delivering half-assed shit that doesn't stand scrutiny (even for the non-hype purposes it was designed for), and somehow I am the "fringe skeptic". If skeptics are on the fringe, then who is in charge of mainstream?

replies(1): >>44550417 #
3. meowface ◴[13 Jul 25 13:43 UTC] No.44550417[source]▶
I meant the misinterpretation was formed because that particular misinterpretation was an interpretation that fit your narrative.

I would recommend reading the article in its entirety.