←back to thread

594 points geox | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
dgb23 ◴[] No.44454168[source]
There are so many red flags with this administration that I lost count. Policing speech, suppressing information, cutting research funding, cutting social programs, increasing spending and intensity for deportations, deporting people for political affiliation, an unnecessarily disruptive economic policy and many reports of general incompetence, lying and corruption.

It's all so bleak. Where is the payoff?

replies(6): >>44454185 #>>44454193 #>>44454376 #>>44455419 #>>44458260 #>>44459955 #
lotsofpulp ◴[] No.44454185[source]
The new tax bill, which benefits asset owners (wealthy), older people, and the beneficiaries of the wealthy.

When you have a population age histogram that is flattening and eventually an upside down triangle, you need some way of extracting labor from the young and giving it to the old (the chosen ones who can afford it) to maintain the socioeconomic hierarchy.

The young without inheritances won’t ever have it as good, so you’ll need to distract them and otherwise fool them into believing it is their duty to transfer their earned income via earned income taxes to the elderly.

replies(2): >>44454744 #>>44455026 #
epgui ◴[] No.44454744[source]
Right, because that’s a “smart” way to tackle the demographic collapse/crisis while totally not making the problem worse.
replies(2): >>44456998 #>>44457111 #
triceratops ◴[] No.44457111[source]
Why do we need to "tackle" the demographic collapse? The CEO of Ford just said he expects 50% of white-collar jobs to be eliminated soon. Tax the AI and you'll have plenty of money for retirees. There's nothing wrong with naturally, and gradually, going back to the population levels of 1980 or whatever.
replies(1): >>44460106 #
1. cwmoore ◴[] No.44460106[source]
[flagged]