←back to thread

200 points dcu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
CharlesW ◴[] No.44457094[source]
Pocketbase is already the poor man's BaaS, and is minimalist compared to the two others mentioned.

> Data stored in human-readable CSVs

The choice to not use a database when two near-perfect tiny candidates exist, and furthermore to choose the notorious CSV format for storing data, is absolutely mystifying. One can use their Wasm builds if platform-specific binaries offend.

replies(6): >>44457217 #>>44457440 #>>44457602 #>>44459642 #>>44460110 #>>44460962 #
loeber ◴[] No.44457602[source]
In 2025, pretending that a CSV can be a reasonable alternative to a database because it is "smaller" is just wild. Totally unconscionable.
replies(5): >>44457929 #>>44458129 #>>44458193 #>>44460475 #>>44464263 #
r0fl ◴[] No.44458129[source]
I use CSV files to run multiple sites with 40,000+ pages each. Close to 1mil pages total

Super fast

Can’t hack me because those CSV files are stored elsewhere and only pulled on build

Free, ultra fast, no latency. Every alternative I’ve tried is slower and eventually costs money.

CSV files stored on GitHub/vercel/netlify/cloudflare pages can scale to millions of rows for free if divided properly

replies(5): >>44458194 #>>44458300 #>>44458419 #>>44458904 #>>44464188 #
1. Drew_ ◴[] No.44458419[source]
It sounds like you use CSVs to build static websites, not store or update any dynamic data. That's not even remotely comparable.