←back to thread

252 points CharlesW | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.53s | source
Show context
fidotron ◴[] No.44457084[source]
There are definite philosophical questions over the merits of adding noise, but the problem with their example here is their denoising process appears to excessively blur everything, so both it and the synthesized grain image look noticeably less sharp than the source. The grain itself also looks too much like basic noise, and not really grain like.
replies(8): >>44457155 #>>44457423 #>>44457483 #>>44457566 #>>44457894 #>>44458122 #>>44458449 #>>44459011 #
1. isx726552 ◴[] No.44458122[source]
Agree, as someone who has spent way too much time studying the way motion picture film looks up close, this isn’t very realistic looking. It’s really just a form of dithering.
replies(2): >>44458607 #>>44458813 #
2. ByThyGrace ◴[] No.44458607[source]
Forget the film grain, give us film lint and film hair!
3. ricardobeat ◴[] No.44458813[source]
Video codecs use a lot of tricks based on human perception, perhaps it's much closer to the real thing when in motion vs a still image?