←back to thread

252 points CharlesW | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jedbrooke ◴[] No.44457031[source]
> This grain, formed from tiny particles during the film’s development, is more than just a visual effect. It plays a key role in storytelling by enhancing the film’s depth and contributing to its realism.

I never understood the “grain = realism” thing. my real eyes don’t have grain. I do appreciate the role of grain as an artistic tool though, so this is still cool tech

replies(20): >>44457115 #>>44457176 #>>44457190 #>>44457304 #>>44457366 #>>44457589 #>>44457682 #>>44457732 #>>44457872 #>>44457896 #>>44457993 #>>44458409 #>>44458653 #>>44459145 #>>44459768 #>>44463102 #>>44463118 #>>44464123 #>>44464590 #>>44471828 #
sneak ◴[] No.44457732[source]
grain and 24fps and widescreen trigger certain contextual emotions around the movie-watching experience. remove them and your brain contextualizes the video very differently.

this is likely the result of ~100 years of film-based filmmaking and projection. hell, we still call it filmmaking.

replies(1): >>44457933 #
1. UltraSane ◴[] No.44457933[source]
Yes, it is only the result of familiarity. We could gradually increase the frame rate of movies made in a year by 1 fps per year and then no one would even notice after 24 years every new movie would be 48fps.
replies(1): >>44464634 #
2. sneak ◴[] No.44464634[source]
No, it would take a lot longer than that. You’re fighting 100 years of tradition.
replies(1): >>44465298 #
3. UltraSane ◴[] No.44465298[source]
You would notice 1 fps more per year?
replies(1): >>44465393 #
4. sneak ◴[] No.44465393{3}[source]
no i will be watching 24fps films for the remainder of my life, which may be 40 more years. if all new films went up 1fps per year i would still go out to the movies in 20 years and be like “wtf is this crap?”

it would take a generation or more to eradicate this cultural context. casablanca is never going to be in 48fps.

replies(1): >>44468483 #
5. UltraSane ◴[] No.44468483{4}[source]
That is a very very silly attitude.