←back to thread

Spending Too Much Money on a Coding Agent

(allenpike.com)
152 points GavinAnderegg | 1 comments | 01 Jul 25 12:26 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
cmrdporcupine ◴[03 Jul 25 15:02 UTC] No.44455776[source]▶
I get a lot of value out of Claude Max at $100 USD/month. I use it almost exclusively for my personal open source projects. For work, I'm more cautious.

I worry, with an article like this floating around, and with this as the competition, and with the economics of all this stuff generally... major price increases are on the horizon.

Businesses (some) can afford this, after all it's still just a portion of the costs of a SWE salary (tho $1000/m is getting up there). But open source developers cannot.

I worry about this trend, and when the other shoe will drop on Anthropic's products, at least.

replies(4): >>44455817 #>>44456022 #>>44456364 #>>44456374 #
1. barrkel ◴[03 Jul 25 15:57 UTC] No.44456364[source]▶
Where do you see the major price increases coming from?

The underlying inference is not super expensive. All the tricks they're pulling to make it smarter certainly multiply the price, but the price being charged almost certainly covers the cost. Basic inference on tuned base models is extremely cheap. But certainly it looks like Anthropic > OpenAI > Google in terms of inference cost structure.

Prices will only come up if there's a profit opportunity; if one of the vendors has a clear edge and gains substantial pricing power. I don't think that's clear at this point. This article is already equivocating between o3 and Opus.