←back to thread

129 points surprisetalk | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.404s | source
Show context
andrewvc ◴[] No.44454291[source]
It’s a fun trip down memory lane, but the real story today, the sadder story, is that there is no longer any use for simple little programs like this that scratch an itch.

They’ve all been solved 100x over by founders who’ve been funded on this site. It used to make sense to have a directory or cgi-bin of helpful scripts. Now it only makes sense as a bit of nostalgia.

I miss the days when we had less, could get less done in a day… but felt more ownership over it. Those days are gone.

replies(6): >>44454622 #>>44454627 #>>44454640 #>>44454654 #>>44455016 #>>44460290 #
FL410 ◴[] No.44455016[source]
I would argue those days are coming back. Thanks to LLMs, I have probably 10x more "utility" scripts/programs than I had 2 years ago. Rather than bang my head against the wall for a couple hours to figure out how to (just barely) do something in Python to scratch an itch, I can get a nice, well documented, reusable and versatile tool in seconds. I'm less inclined than ever to go find some library or product that kinda does what I need it to do, and instead create a simple tool of my own that does exactly what I need it to.
replies(1): >>44455342 #
loloquwowndueo ◴[] No.44455342[source]
Just please if you ever give that tool to someone else to use, understand, maintain, or fix, mention that it was created using an LLM. Maybe ask your LLM to mention itself in a comment near the top of the file.
replies(1): >>44455792 #
1. kfajdsl ◴[] No.44455792[source]
The 'as is' nature of open source applies regardless of whether a human or LLM wrote the code.
replies(1): >>44460013 #
2. loloquwowndueo ◴[] No.44460013[source]
Who said it was open source?