←back to thread

129 points surprisetalk | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.455s | source
Show context
13hunteo ◴[] No.44454433[source]
Mostly unrelated, but I dislike how normalized AI art is.
replies(4): >>44454473 #>>44454596 #>>44454862 #>>44456139 #
mapcars ◴[] No.44454596[source]
Dislike it or not, its normalised as is everything else that is useful.
replies(2): >>44454636 #>>44454674 #
1. csomar ◴[] No.44454674[source]
Useful? I concur with a sibling comment. I stopped reading and closed the article as soon as I saw it.
replies(1): >>44455067 #
2. Melonai ◴[] No.44455067[source]
This happened to me too (almost subconsciously I might add). I'm actually not anti-AI at all, maybe a bit uninterested in AI-made art, since I don't fully see much use for it except for generating fun pictures of Golden Retriever dogs in silly situations, but this imitation-Ghibli art style is probably one of the least pleasing things to my eye that people love making. It's so round and without edge, it's colors are washed out in a very non-offensive way, and also it does not even look like the source material. I wouldn't be so aggrieved by it, I think, if there wasn't that wave where everyone and their dog was making pictures in that style. Sorry, just a small rant tangentially related to the article, which is fine. :)