←back to thread

129 points surprisetalk | 7 comments | | HN request time: 1.137s | source | bottom
Show context
13hunteo ◴[] No.44454433[source]
Mostly unrelated, but I dislike how normalized AI art is.
replies(4): >>44454473 #>>44454596 #>>44454862 #>>44456139 #
1. ancarda ◴[] No.44454473[source]
I don't think it's unrelated at all. I saw the same picture and just closed the tab right away. Why should I read this article, the whole thing might be written by an LLM.
replies(2): >>44454836 #>>44455069 #
2. naikrovek ◴[] No.44454836[source]
I think adding a AI image to filter out readers who think that way might have been intentional.

I certainly consider it a good idea, now that it has come to mind.

replies(2): >>44455416 #>>44455758 #
3. navane ◴[] No.44455069[source]
If anything, the ubiquity of style he used makes it into a deliberate meme. It's a little joke.
4. archerx ◴[] No.44455416[source]
The neo-Luddite filter
5. LastTrain ◴[] No.44455758[source]
Could you also tag it “AI enhanced” or some such for us as well? Thanks.
replies(1): >>44455857 #
6. naikrovek ◴[] No.44455857{3}[source]
nope. i don't use AI to write anything. I will just put an obviously AI image in the article to give those who make assumptions a reason to bail.

and it will work very well.

replies(1): >>44458106 #
7. LastTrain ◴[] No.44458106{4}[source]
What’s wrong with using AI to write something?