I'd like to highlight this:
>NFS with Kerberos
secure, simple, battle tested. no crazy architecture
works so well a bug showed up in the kernel :-)
replies(2):
What exactly are you trying to highlight here? Most code has bugs. This one is someone forgetting to stick to actual behavior described in 1997, it's a mistake, mistakes happen. Which one of "secure", "simple", "battle tested" and "no crazy architecture" do you think this disproves?
Or do you think CIFS or Ceph have no bugs?
I don't think they're being snarky.